Science and Technology
Outlook and Report '95
Science and technology are linked in a multitude of ways, each building constantly on
the gains in the other domain. It is certainly true that technological advance ultimately
depends on fundamental science, and the highly trained people educated at our universities
and colleges. But old distinctions between "basic" and "applied" science are blurring.
In a world of ever tougher global economic competition, links between public and
private science and technology initiatives must grow stronger as well. Private businesses are
the principal actors in converting technology to goods and services, to profits and jobs, and
they have supported much of the research and development needed to develop new
technologies. But the public sector has a vital partnership role to play in the science and
Symbiosis between science and technology. The relationship between basic research,
applied research, technology development, and commercialization is not a linear progression.
Rather, disparate fields of research (e.g., physics and biology), stages of research (e.g.,
benchtop and field test), and venues of research (corporate and government, domestic and
international) now flourish symbiotically. Often a technical or engineering advance will
stimulate or enable scientific inquiry. For example, cars powered by internal combustion
engines hit the road long before scientists began to understand, even imperfectly, some
fundamental principles of combustion. Magnetic resonance imaging was founded on basic
research in atomic and nuclear physics -- but it could not have been put to practical use in
medical diagnostics without the separate but parallel development of a number of
sophisticated technologies, especially the microprocessor, the "computer-on-a-chip" that could
be built directly into the instrument. The cancer treatment drug taxol is derived from the yew
tree of the Pacific Northwest, and without the research to classify and study the natural plants
and animals it might never have been found. Most of today's experimental science has been
enormously enhanced by state-of-the-art technology.
The search for something practical often forces a new look at the scientific principles
that underlie new phenomena; the prepared mind is ready to take a leap into the practical
application. The transistor was invented in a lab program to develop better switches -- but
the scientific work of previous decades on solid state physics and quantum mechanics was
absolutely essential to this invention.
The blending of discovery and application is repeated across virtually all science and
engineering -- from biomedicine to environment to space exploration and aeronautics to
materials and manufacturing. Basic research on materials results in stronger, long lasting
roads and bridges and lighter, but safer airplanes and cars. Today's wonder drugs and
tomorrow's bioremediation of chemical wastes are direct products of our continuing
investments in biology, chemistry, physics, mathematics, and earth science.
The fundamental point is that basic science, applied science, and technology, though
different in approach, motivation, and scale, are profoundly interdependent.
Public and private partnership. The accelerating pace of technological advance,
ever shorter product cycles, and rapid worldwide diffusion of technologies mean that many
companies are finding investment in risky or lower yield research and development less
attractive than in the past. This means that government research and development
partnerships with industry in growth-enhancing technologies are more important than ever.
Without government to share the risk at the pre-commercial stage, individual companies are
reluctant to take the plunge, especially when a substantial fraction of the total return may not
be captured by the individual investing company.
The problem of capturing private returns on pre-commercial research and development
investments is especially great in widely dispersed and fragmented industries such as
agriculture or building and construction. If government fails to support technology advances
in these industries, at least on a cost-shared basis, it will not get done . . . or it will be done
by international competitors. Government support of research and development is an
American tradition. For example, the Morrill Act of 1862, which founded the land grant
colleges across the nation, was aimed at nurturing agriculture and the mechanical arts and
helped build some of our top research universities.
In general, where there is technological uncertainty, research and development projects
with a strong combination of potential public and commercial benefits merit a mix of
government, academic, and industry support. For example, education and training technologies
that challenge and reward our children and bring lifelong learning within reach of everyone
have multiple public and private benefits: a better educated citizenry, a world-class work
force, opportunities for people to retrain themselves in response to changing technologies and
jobs, and a rich commercial market for the learning technologies. Government's role in
facilitating the National Information Infrastructure and the emerging Global Information
Infrastructure is not only to share the costs of research and development, but also to assure
access to all Americans and compatibility with other nations' information highways.
Box: Partnership Programs: Linking High-Tech Industry and Government
Advanced Technology Program (ATP). The National Institute for Standards and
Technology's ATP works with industry to promote the development of high risk but highly
promising technologies to enable novel or greatly improved products and services for the
world market. Government provides the catalyst, but industry conceives, partially funds, and
executes ATP projects. On average, ATP award recipients pay more than half the total costs
of the research and development, and all awards are made through a competitive merit-based
selection process. Cost sharing helps ensure that companies have a vested interest in the
success of the project and timely commercialization, and competitive selection guards against
Technology Reinvestment Project (TRP). This Nation cannot maintain separate
military and civilian industrial bases and keep the technological advantage that has been the
mainstay of our defense. The dual use technology strategy is a fundamentally new way of
doing business designed to break down barriers created over decades between defense and
commercial sectors. The TRP, a multiagency effort, is the largest and most visible dual use
initiative. The TRP has completed 2 major competitions in which federal matching funds
totaling $805 million were awarded to 251 projects involving 1,900 firms, universities, and
others, leveraging a total of $2 billion.
Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs). CRADAs are
cost-shared projects between industry and government laboratories. The federal labs
contribute expertise and technology but do not provide funds to the non-federal party. By the
end of 1994, agencies had a total of more than 5,000 CRADAs valued at over $3.8 billion.
Today many in industry are taking a new, results-oriented view of their research and
development programs. Corporate cost-cutting drives have led to focusing in-house research
and development on technologies that are close to commercialization, at the expense of more
basic, longer term, or riskier research. The new model of best practice that is taking form is
to create partnerships for riskier, generic, pre-commercial research and development --
teaming with other companies, with universities, and with the government.
The Administration has re-invented government partnership programs to make sure
that they are:
- market-driven, with industry leading the joint research agenda;
- cost-shared, with the private sector putting up half or more of the money, as a quasi-market test to make sure the technological risk is worth taking;
competitive, merit-based, and peer-reviewed; and
- evaluated periodically and rigorously to make sure that the projects have the intended effect.
With the assistance of progressive government policies, U.S. companies have recently
regained a competitive edge in critical technologies, such as semiconductors, once thought
lost to Japanese and other competitors. We must guard against a scenario in which American
scientists and inventors make breakthroughs, only to see the jobs and profits growing out of
U.S. discoveries and inventions flow to overseas competitors.
Federal Priorities in Science and Technology
Effective governance requires transforming our broad goal -- enhancing the general
welfare with advances in science and technology -- into concrete, manageable objectives. We
have focused federal efforts in priority areas that envelop what America values most. These
priorities were established under the auspices of the National Science and Technology
The following text describes federal investments in these areas, highlighting a small
cross-section of our research and development programs. These research and development
initiatives generally serve more than one objective -- a salutary effect of the effort to stretch
taxpayer dollars and optimize each investment in the future. Many of our efforts, for
example, in environment, health, and basic research benefit from international cooperation
while advancing our interests in international stability and economic progress.
Health. Good health and long life are goals of every American. A strong biomedical
research base, an accessible, efficient health care system, and a safe and affordable food
supply are prerequisites to these goals. Federal investments in these areas have direct and
immediate impacts on quality of life, and they make good economic sense as well. For
example, each year vaccinations of infants to prevent haemophilus influenzae type b saves our
nation approximately 20 times the total cost of the research leading to the vaccine's
We have witnessed vast improvements in health and longevity in recent decades, but
enormous challenges still exist. For example:
- Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death and disability in American men and women;
- Alzheimer's disease afflicts 4 million Americans at an annual economic cost of $90 billion and untold social cost;
- Each year foodborne disease leads to as many as 33 million illnesses and $13 billion in medical costs and productivity losses;
- Injuries, many preventable, cost society $220 billion annually;
- AIDS has become the leading cause of death among all Americans ages 25-44;
- Breast cancer is diagnosed in 190,000 women each year and is the cause of 46,000 deaths annually.
Box: New Advance in Treating Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle cell disease (SCD) affects 1 in 500 African Americans. Painful crisis, the
most common manifestation of SCD, impairs the quality of life and productivity of affected
individuals and frequently requires emergency room treatment or hospitalization. Sickle cell
patients often require chronic transfusion therapy, which puts them at risk for disease
transmission and other problems.
NIH has completed a clinical trial of the drug hydroxyurea, the first therapeutic agent
for patients with SCD to show promise of clinical efficacy without life-threatening toxicity.
The trial was deemed successful when interim analysis of data indicated that daily
administration of hydroxyurea reduced the frequency of painful episodes and associated
hospital admissions by about 50 percent. Hydroxyurea therapy also reduced by half the
frequency of acute chest syndrome, a life-threatening complication of SCD. Patients
receiving hydroxyurea required 50 percent fewer units of transfused blood than patients who
took a placebo, a finding with important public health implications. The results of this trial
are expected to improve the quality of life for SCD patients and reduce the costs associated
with their care.
To address the range of problems these examples represent, the Administration has
established scientific goals and research priorities in 5 main areas. Biomedical, socio-cultural,
and behavioral research and development will reveal the fundamental processes of human
biology and provide insight into risk factors for disease and injury. Health systems and
services research and development will improve access to the benefits of one of the world's
most sophisticated health systems. This type of research recently led to two clinical practice
guidelines -- one on low back pain and one on fluid in the inner ear of children -- that could
reduce health care expenditures by more than $5 billion. Health promotion and disease and
injury prevention research and development offer the most direct means to reduce the
enormous personal, social, and economic toll from premature birth, childhood illness, cancer,
obesity, heart disease, disabilities, infectious disease, drug abuse, and tobacco use.
will ensure we meet the food needs
of the United States and the world in the year 2100. We intend to harness the genetic
resources of plants and animals and combine that potential with improved food safety
technologies. Human nutrition research and development will help us reduce the risk of diet-
related disease -- the largest controllable factor in long-term health for Americans who do not
smoke, drink to excess, or work in hazardous environs.
Health, safety, and food are global concerns, and research and development in these
areas has significant international dimensions. For example, bilateral and multilateral research
programs are providing international research experience to the next generation of health and
agriculture scientists during the early stages of their careers. International data standards are
being developed to facilitate future international collaborative research efforts, particularly
comparative studies in epidemiology and health systems and services. Emerging infectious
disease threats are a reminder that no nation can be complacent regarding human vulnerability
to microorganisms, and emphasize the continued need for collaborative surveillance systems
and research on disease prevention and treatment. Such collaborative programs encourage
continued cooperation and mutually beneficial partnerships between the United States and
Box: Long Term Ecological Research and the Hantavirus
Mice and other rodents are important, often abundant inhabitants of arid environments.
They are a food source for predators and directly affect plant communities by consuming and
spreading plant seeds. Thus, rodents have been studied by scientists at the Sevilleta Long
Term Ecological Research (LTER) site since it was established in 1988 as part of a research
program to understand the dynamic processes that shape and change ecosystems.
In 1993 the rodent research took on a new importance when physicians in northern
New Mexico and Arizona reported a high number of deaths from an unusual respiratory
disease caused by a previously-unknown species of Hantavirus. Hantaviruses were known to
be transmitted by rodents, and anecdotal information from residents in the afflicted area
suggested that rodents were exceptionally abundant in the winter of 1992-93. This led health
officials to speculate that, if true, the increased potential for human contact with rodents
might have led to the sudden epidemic.
The Federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta enlisted
Sevilleta LTER scientists to provide ecological information on the deer mouse and other
native rodent species. The LTER database showed a ten-fold population increase in various
field mouse and wood rat populations during the spring of 1993, thus confirming the likely
connection between the Hantavirus epidemic and rodent population increases. The ecological
and climatological data from the LTER research will be important in formulating models that
predict future rodent population increase and allow improved disease prevention strategies.
Thus, research initially conducted to understand the role of rodents in natural habitats is
playing a key role in safeguarding human health.
Environmental Quality. A fundamental challenge facing our society is sustainable
development: development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Protecting our environment and natural
resource base while enhancing economic growth requires knowledge of many complex natural
phenomena, their interrelationships, and the effects of human activities. We are developing a
research program that will provide this knowledge and enable us to anticipate future
environmental problems and prevent them, rather than respond to them after the fact. The
benefits of such an approach are a cleaner environment at lower cost, an increase in U.S.
economic competitiveness, and improved quality of life for all Americans.
The range of environmental and natural resource issues related to sustainable
development is diverse: it encompasses both urban and rural issues at the local, regional, and
global scales, affecting human health and the quality of both aquatic and terrestrial ecological
systems. These issues include pesticides, toxic substances, hazardous and solid waste, water
quality, air pollution, and natural disasters. Other important local-to-regional concerns include
improving resource use by addressing such problems as inadequate water supplies, the loss of
wetlands, soil erosion, and the extraction and use of energy resources. Other critical problems
have international and global implications: deforestation, loss of biological diversity,
stratospheric ozone depletion, and climate change.
We have made significant progress in learning how to manage our environment and
natural resources effectively and to repair damage from past practices, largely because of our
improved understanding of complex natural systems. Yet with our growing knowledge has
come recognition of our vast ignorance about many facets of environmental issues and the
need to develop the information and data to manage and avert future threats more effectively
and efficiently. No longer can we repeat the mistakes of the past that now pose huge burdens
on our society and require amelioration.
Box: Scientific Research Protects Human Health
Twenty years ago we determined a need to understand the impacts of emissions of
synthetic chemicals containing chlorine, bromine, and fluorine on stratospheric ozone. Today
we know unequivocally that the ozone layer is being depleted because of human activities and
that loss of the ozone layer threatens human health by increasing the ground-level UV-B
radiation that causes skin cancers. This knowledge has led to international agreements that
limit the production and use of ozone-depleting chemicals, and advances in technology have
resulted in industrial and manufacturing use of cost-effective substitutes that do not degrade
the ozone layer. Because of the research and early detection of stratospheric ozone depletion,
technological response has enabled us to largely avert a major global environmental problem
while still providing the benefits of air conditioning, refrigeration, and other necessities and
amenities that once depended on ozone-destroying chemicals.
Faced with inadequate information, we often either fail to capture opportunities to
avoid significant problems with reasonable solutions or overcompensate with overly strict
controls and limits, wasting resources on the wrong problems or responses. In contrast,
balanced and informed public policy must be based upon a sound understanding of problems
and potential solutions; this is an important role of federal scientific research. Scientific
research should provide unbiased knowledge relevant to critical policy questions. Effective
decisions regarding the environment and natural resources must be informed by integrated
knowledge from the natural, social, and economic sciences.
An improved understanding of the environment will contribute to a healthier, safer
America, enhanced national security, and a stronger economy. Environmental research and
development contributes to public health and well being by increasing our understanding of
the changes in environmental conditions that can threaten health and safety. We know that
changes in climate can increase the loss of life from heat-related mortality and severe storms
and increase the range of diseases such as malaria, dengue fever, and cholera. Increases in
urban and rural ozone and airborne particles can increase the incidence of respiratory ailments
such as asthma, and exposure to toxic materials can lead to cancer, birth defects, and other
health problems. Further research is needed to address and prevent environmentally-related
Environmental research and development contributes to our national security by
improving management of ecosystems and natural resources. We have witnessed instances of
environmental degradation, ecological damage, and depletion of natural resources creating
confrontations between nations. Predicting, preventing, and/or remediating potentially
destabilizing environmental problems, coupled with the development of long-term sources of
food, water, and energy, are essential to global stability and U.S. national security.
Box: Timely Hurricane Warnings Save Lives, Property
President and First Lady | Vice President and Mrs. Gore
Record of Progress | The Briefing Room
Gateway to Government | Contacting the White House
White House for Kids | White House History
White House Tours | Help | Text Only