September 17, 1998
OMB BULLETIN NO. 98-09
TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 1999 Information Collection Budget
These efforts will be led by the agencies' Chief Information Officers (CIOs) and carried out by senior-level agency officials. Note that this bulletin requires different reporting than was required in the past. The Appendices highlight these differences.
For the first time, agencies are asked to submit this information electronically together with one paper copy. Please use file format WordPerfect, versions 6.1 or 7.0, or Microsoft Word, version 5.0, on a 3.5" diskette. Please label the disk with the agency name and the filename(s) of the submission.
The reports should be delivered to:
Department of Agriculture
Department of Commerce
Department of Defense
Department of Education
Department of Energy
Department of Health and Human Services
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Department of the Interior
Department of Justice
Department of Labor
Department of State
Department of Transportation
Department of the Treasury
Department of Veterans Affairs
Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR Secretariat)
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Trade Commission
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Science Foundation
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Securities and Exchange Commission
Small Business Administration
Social Security Administration
Questions about this Bulletin should be directed to David Rostker, tel. (202) 395-3897, E-mail: David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov.
Attachments
The first document you will need to prepare, described in section III, is a description of your agency's strategic plan to improve the management of information collection activities and your accomplishments to minimize burden on the public. This information will help OMB prepare the Information Collection Budget and set targets for burden reduction in FY 1999.
The second document of your submission, described in section IV, will serve as a starting point for OMB's preparation of your agency's section in the Information Collection Budget. This narrative should be written in a format and manner similar to chapter 4 of the Information Collection Budget of the United States, Fiscal Year 1998, published by OMB in July 1998. Other information you submit in response to sections V, VI, and VII, will support this narrative.
Many agencies now report paperwork burden in terms of dollar costs, as well as burden hours. For example, the burden of a regulatory recordkeeping requirement is more readily estimated in terms of the dollar cost (e.g., for the space and equipment needed for storage) than time. Similarly, the burden of a third-party disclosure (e.g., the table describing the nutritional content of packages foods on food containers) is also more readily estimated in terms of cost. (These dollar costs are separate from hour burdens and are not hour burdens that are converted into dollars.) Starting with this ICB, OMB intends to begin reporting both the hour and financial burdens of information collections as reported by the agencies in their information collection requests. Thus, in submitting information concerning paperwork burden, you should include, as appropriate, both burden hours and dollar costs. The following instructions for agency submissions reflect this change.
OMB has already requested that errors in the paperwork inventory be corrected based upon the July 31, 1998, and August 31, 1998, monthly inventories already sent to your agency. As OMB stated:
"We'd also like to request your assistance in eliminating errors in the inventory early. In past years, in preparing for the Information Collection Budget, we sent a hard copy of the inventory to you to review and submit corrections. This is no longer necessary because of the monthly electronic transmittal of the inventory. Please review the monthly inventories for errors as soon as you receive them, so that we do not need to adjust the September 30 numbers for publication. We would also like to ensure that, wherever appropriate, actual cost information is reported."
OMB did this in order to allow you to begin reviewing the correcting errors in the paperwork inventory early, thus permitting you to develop the submissions for the 1999 ICB based on a corrected September 30, 1998, inventory.
This document should be a strategic plan for reducing burden and improving information resources management. The narrative should be centered on the big picture, looking at ways the CIO is working to improve information collection activities and reduce information collection burden. This would include efforts such as electronic reporting and recordkeeping, intra- and inter-agency coordination, and public participation.
Support this strategic plan with descriptions of specific actions your agency will take to find opportunities for burden reduction, including which target programs, your timetables for performing such actions, and the CIO's role in these actions. Describe any circumstances beyond your control, including new statutes and government-wide initiatives, which may prevent or reverse burden reduction efforts. If your strategy requires interagency or OMB assistance, this document should highlight that need and explain exactly how OMB can assist the process. If your agency desires changes in statute to accomplish reduction, provide specific citations and recommendations for OMB's consideration.
Finally, this document should document your agency's work on this strategic plan by summarizing your burden reduction efforts in FY 1998. Include specific examples of reduction which have come about through agency initiatives to improve information resources management, even if burden reduction was not the primary goal.
Provide an entry (one or two paragraphs) for each significant program change or adjustment giving the title of the collection, OMB control number, a brief description of the collection, a brief description of the change and its reasons, and the change in burden (hours and costs). You may combine several changes of a like nature into a single entry, but be sure to give the title and OMB control number of each collection changed. All of these entries together should account for the vast majority of the total change between FY 1997 and FY 1998.
Provide an entry (one or two paragraphs) for each significant program change or adjustment giving the title of the collection, OMB control number, a brief description of the collection, a brief description of the change and its reasons, and the change in burden (hours and costs). You may combine several changes of a like nature into a single entry, but be sure to give the title and OMB control number of each collection changed. All of these entries together should account for the vast majority of the total change between FY 1998 and FY 1999.
For each action, list the OMB numbers affected and the dates of OMB action, describe the specific changes (e.g., more frequent reporting, consolidation of several forms, cross-cutting activities), the causes for action (e.g., new statutes, initiatives, policy changes, change in the number of respondents), a breakdown of the hours affected by each change, and whether each change was due to program changes or adjustments to the reported burden. Use the comments section to explain any additional details, including specific statutory changes which led directly to changes in paperwork burden, and link these reductions to the strategic plan described for section III of this appendix. Please be specific. Attach additional sheets as necessary.
For each action, list the OMB numbers to be affected, describe the specific changes (e.g., more frequent reporting, consolidation of several forms, cross-cutting activities), the causes for action (e.g., new statutes, initiatives, policy changes, change in the number of respondents), a breakdown of the hours affected by each change, and whether each change was due to program changes or adjustments to your reported burden. Use the comments section to explain any additional details and link these reductions to the strategic plan described for section III of this appendix. Please be specific. Attach additional sheets as necessary.
Summarize the statute's major effects. Describe each information collection affected (including OMB number if the collection already exists) and the specific changes required, including changes in burden. Quote and cite the specific statutory language which requires changes. Describe the actions the CIO is taking to minimize the burden imposed by statutory changes.
Title(s): U.S. Survey | OMB Number(s): 0000-0000 |
Total Burden Hours | Total Cost Burden | |
End of FY 1997 | 12,000,000 | 0 |
End of FY 1998 | 14,000,000 | 5,000,000 |
Change in Hours | Change in Cost | Type of Change | Description of Change |
---|---|---|---|
- | +$3,000,000 | Program | Estimated previously unreported costs. |
+4,000,000 | +$2,000,000 | Program | [Describe specific agency action, causes for action, and, if this page covers multiple OMB numbers, which OMB number is affected.] |
-3,000,000 | - | Program | [Describe specific agency action, causes for action, and, if this page covers multiple OMB numbers, which OMB number is affected.] |
+1,000,000 | - | Adjustment | Increase in eligible recipients for aid from 25,000,000 to 26,000,000. |
[You may use this format to describe changes in a single collection, changes in a series of related collections, or changes through a coordinated agency initiative.]
Title(s): U.S. Survey | OMB Number(s): 0000-0000 |
Total Burden Hours | Total Cost Burden | |
End of FY 1998 | 12,000,000 | 0 |
End of FY 1999 | 14,000,000 | 5,000,000 |
Change in Hours | Change in Cost | Type of Change | Description of Change |
---|---|---|---|
- | +$3,000,000 | Program | Estimated previously unreported costs. |
+4,000,000 | +$2,000,000 | Program | [Describe specific agency action, causes for action, and, if this page covers multiple OMB numbers, which OMB number is affected.] |
-3,000,000 | - | Program | [Describe specific agency action, causes for action, and, if this page covers multiple OMB numbers, which OMB number is affected.] |
+1,000,000 | - | Adjustment | Increase in eligible recipients for aid from 25,000,000 to 26,000,000. |
For all other violations that occurred during FY 1998, provide the following information:
(See Table A-2 of OMB's Information Collection Budget of the United States, Fiscal Year 1998 for a suggested format.)
If you discover any violations during the preparation of this report, please contact your OIRA desk officer and remedy the violation immediately.
Burden Estimation Methodology: Internal Revenue Service
IRS' estimates of taxpayer burden are calculated using a series of mathematical models--which are installed on personal computers--that were developed from regression analysis of survey data on the amount of time that individuals, partnerships, corporations, and paid tax preparers spend performing activities that are necessary to meet tax filing requirements. These activities, which correspond to the Paperwork Reduction Act's definition of burden (44 U.S.C. 3502(2)), are: (1) recordkeeping, (2) learning about tax law, (3) preparing tax forms, and (4) copying, assembling, and sending tax forms to IRS. A burden equation for each activity takes into account basic characteristics of tax forms and instructions, form and line usage by taxpayers, and characteristics of the taxpayer populations using the forms. There is a separate set of burden equations for individual and business taxpayers. IRS accounts for the use of paid preparers by estimating (1) the equivalent time that would have been spent by individual taxpayers who used paid preparers if those taxpayers had instead prepared their returns themselves and (2) the actual time of paid preparers used by business taxpayers.
The data used to construct the burden models were collected from three surveys conducted in 1984. The data for individual burden models were obtained from a diary study in which approximately 750 individual taxpayers kept track daily of the time they spent completing their tax returns and a mail survey in which about 6,200 taxpayers were asked to report the amount of time they spent performing various tax-preparation activities. Data for business taxpayers were obtained from a survey of 4,000 corporations and partnerships and their paid tax preparers. These businesses reported how much time they spent performing activities that they undertook for the express purpose of meeting their tax filing requirements. Multiple linear regression analysis of the data collected from the surveys was used to identify variables that correlated with time spent on preparing tax returns. Through careful model specification, more than 100 variables likely to have a causal relation with time spent were tested.
The individual burden models predict the average burden to file a given form by type of activity (i.e., recordkeeping, learning, preparing, sending). The total burden for all individual taxpayers filing the form is calculated by multiplying the average form burden for each activity by the total number of taxpayer responses filed during a given tax year and then aggregating the burden over all activities. Some of the predictor variables in the individual burden models include (for a given form):
The business burden models predict by type of activity (i.e., recordkeeping, learning, obtaining materials, locating/using a preparer, preparing, sending) and by preparer (paid vs. self) the average business taxpayer paperwork burden to file a given form. The method for obtaining the aggregate burden of all business taxpayers is the same one used for individual taxpayers described above. A separate set of business burden models predicts the preparation time for certain information returns, such as the W-2 and 1099 series. Some of the predictor variables in the business burden models include (for a given form):
(10) Direct the senior official [CIO] appointed pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3506(b) to monitor agency compliance with the policies, procedures, and guidance in this Circular. Acting as an ombudsman, the senior official shall consider alleged instances of agency failure to comply with this Circular and recommend or take corrective action as appropriate. The senior official shall report annually, not later than February 1st of each year, to the Director [of OMB] those instances of alleged failure to comply with this Circular and their resolution.
Include this report in your submission to OMB under this bulletin. If you have received no complaints for FY 1998, state that fact at the end of your submission.
The Budget Legislative Information Management Reform/GPRA Grants Management Financial Management Procurement Policy Information & Regulatory Policy Contact the White House Web Master