| The Administration supports the objectives of H.R. 4300 and shares the
Congress' commitment to reducing the supply of drugs coming into the United
States from other countries in the Western Hemisphere.  However, the
Administration opposes H.R. 4300 as currently drafted.  Some of the
Administration's concerns include: 
   Funding enhancements that are not tied to a coherent strategy
   .  The bill simply enumerates a series of specific procurement and
   funding actions without indicating how they relate to one another or to
   existing drug interdiction activities.  The Administration has proposed
   a comprehensive and integrated approach to reducing the flow of drugs
   into the United States in its National Drug Control Strategy.
   Proposing authorizations that are far in excess of expected
   appropriations and the President's Budget without specifying where these
   funds will come from.  H.R. 4300 would authorize $2.6 billion in
   appropriations in addition to those already authorized for FYs
   1999-2001.  To date, Congress has not appropriated funds for many of the
   Administration's anti-drug abuse requests.  As one example, the House
   has provided the Coast Guard with approximately $82 million less than
   requested for FY 1999 to maintain current operating levels.
   Infringing on the authority of the President and the Secretary of
   State.   H.R. 4300 would infringe on the President's appointment
   powers and the Secretary of State's flexibility in personnel matters and
   intrude upon well established procedures for providing foreign military
   assistance.
   Suggesting the transfer of the Bureau of International Narcotics
   and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) from the State Department to the Drug
   Enforcement Administration.  The clear assumption of Section 207 is
   that certain foreign assistance activities of the State Department could
   be better carried out by a law enforcement agency.  This assumption is
   neither substantiated nor soundly based.   INL is a central and
   highly-regarded component of the interagency counter-narcotics effort.
   Imposing inflexible requirements that could quickly become
   useless.  The bill would authorize funds for two mobile x-ray
   machines to be placed along a specific highway in Bolivia.  The
   locations of such machines should not be specified by statute but left
   to the discretion of the commanders on the ground.
   Reducing the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies by
   consolidating joint interagency task forces (JIATF).   Consolidating
   all JIATFs would reduce Defense Department support to law enforcement
   agencies attempting to disrupt the flow of drugs from Asia and the
   Southwest Border. 
The Administration looks forward to working with the Congress to implement
a drug control strategy that is realistic, comprehensive, coherent, and
flexible.
 
 |