Staff Summary of Testimony to the PCSCB: Norton, U.S. House of Representatives
Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC) (appearance on January 30, 1998)

Testimony: Delegate Norton advocated having a capital budget. She urged the Commission to use the District as a case study, because the study would indicate the need for reforming the current budgeting practice. Her remarks centered around three ideas:

Delegate Norton said she's been trying to get Federal funds to develop the SFC, so Federal agencies could occupy federally owned facilities to reduce a huge rental bill. She said Congress authorized the full amount to develop this land, but scoring rules left the site still undeveloped. She believes the District has many examples of pent-up Federal infrastructure needs that are unmet and a study of budget practices would indicate the need for reform.

She believes capital budgeting is a traditional practice, because it is used by almost every State and large city. She cited the Port Authority of New York as one example of where a capital program was successfully financed through a sale of bonds.

She said using money over time to fund projects with future benefits is the accepted marketplace strategy for businesses and homeowners alike. She feels the Federal government should adopt this strategy.

In closing, she supported having a capital budget by saying, "Now is the time to organize the budget around fresh ideas that are consistent with an investment rather than an operating approach to investments."

Questions from the Commissioners: Questions focused primarily on funding delays for SFC, the definition of capital, and the special mechanism used to build the Ronald Reagan building.

Q.    Why was the funding for SFC delayed? Why was this property not sold to the private sector for development?
A.    The funding has been delayed because the total amount had to be scored under the discretionary cap in a single year. Also, the Federal government is reluctant to sell property in the city to private developers, because we already rent so much.

Q.    Should the definition of capital be restrictive or expansive?
A.    I recognize the difficulty of defining capital, so I urge you to first look at the scoring problems we have encountered. In one instance, the Federal government did not score the expenditures for building the Ronald Reagan building, because the building process involved an innovative sale-and-lease-back type of agreement with GSA.

President's Commission to Study Capital Budgeting

More Summaries

More Summaries II














President and First Lady | Vice President and Mrs. Gore
Record of Progress | The Briefing Room
Gateway to Government | Contacting the White House | White House for Kids
White House History | White House Tours | Help
Privacy Statement


Site Map

Graphic Version

T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E