EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY (THIS STATEMENT HAS BEEN COORDINATED BY OMB WITH THE CONCERNED AGENCIES.)
August 6, 1998
H.R. 3892 - English Language Fluency Act
(Rep. Riggs (R) CA and 3 others)
The Administration strongly opposes H.R. 3892, which would significantly
amend the Bilingual Education Act. While there is a need to strengthen
programs designed to help students with limited English proficiency (LEP)
learn English, meet challenging standards in academic subjects, and
successfully move into mainstream classes, H.R. 3892 would not accomplish
these purposes. It is a step in the wrong direction.
H.R. 3892 is objectionable because it would:
Force school districts to cut off services arbitrarily to students
who need them, and deny funds to school districts if they fail to do so.
Eliminate professional development programs that focus on the
preparation of teachers, thereby exacerbating the current shortage of
qualified bilingual and English-as-a-second language teachers.
Eliminate targeting of limited Federal funds on school districts
with the greatest need and the highest quality programs, by replacing
the current competitive grants program with a State block grant.
Fail to include safeguards to prevent States and school districts
from reducing their financial support for educating LEP students.
Curtail necessary efforts by the Education Department to protect the
civil rights of LEP students by voiding compliance agreements where
local educational agencies (LEAs) have chosen bilingual education as the
means of complying with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. This would
generate costly and time-consuming law suits for LEAs and deny them the
ability to resolve compliance issues voluntarily.
The President has articulated a clear set of principles to strengthen
education programs for LEP students. This bill does not reflect those
principles, and will not improve education programs for these students. It
will not help them to learn English more rapidly, nor will it help them to
meet challenging standards in academic subject areas.