| 1. | A total of fifty-two determinations were made not to comply with requests for records, or to redact portions of records, under the number 5 U.S.C. §552(a). It should be noted that in a single responsive document several exemptions may have been cited. |
| | Reason | Number of Times | | (a) | Agency had no records responsive | 22 | | (b) | Agency-to-agency requests are not provided for under the Freedom of Information Act | 0 | | (c) | Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (2) | 7 | | (d) | Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (4) | 18 | | (e) | Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (5) | 2 | | (f) | Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (6) | 3 | |
| 2. | One appeal was made under Subsection 552 (a) (6). Response to the appeal confirmed that the agency had no records responsive to the request. |
| 3. | Participating individuals cited in all letters of denial, and the number of instances of participation for each:
|
| Carol Ehrlich
Freedom of Information Act Officer
| 21 |
| 4. | The results of proceedings conducted pursuant to Subsection (a) (4) (F) against the officer or employee who was primarily responsible for improperly withholding records were not applicable to the agency. |
| 5-7. | A copy of the Office of Administration's fee schedule, fee waiver policy and miscellaneous fee provisions under 5 CFR §§ 2502.11-15 are attached. |
| (a) The Office of Administration collected $1,089.51 in 1996 for making records available. |
| | |
