CIRCULAR NO. A-119
Revised OMB CircularA-119 establishes
policies on Federal use and development of voluntary consensus
standards and on
conformity assessment activities. Pub. L. 104-113, the "National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995," codified existing
policies in A-119, established reporting requirements, and authorized the
National Institute of Standards and Technology to coordinate conformity
assessment activities of the agencies. OMB is issuing this revision of
the Circular in order to make the terminology of the Circular consistent
with the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, to
issue guidance to the agencies on making their reports to OMB, to direct
the Secretary of Commerce to issue policy guidance for conformity
assessment, and to make changes for clarity.
Franklin D. Raines
a. When must my agency use voluntary consensus
standards?
Your agency must use voluntary consensus standards, both domestic and
international, in
its regulatory and procurement activities in lieu of government-unique
standards, unless
use of such standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical.
In all cases, your agency has the discretion to decline to use existing
voluntary
consensus standards if your agency determines that such standards are
inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
(1) "Use" means incorporation of a standard in whole,
in part, or by
reference for procurement purposes, and the inclusion of a
standard in whole, in
part, or by reference in regulation(s).
(2) "Impractical" includes circumstances in which such use
would fail to serve
the agency's program needs; would be infeasible; would be inadequate,
ineffectual,
inefficient, or inconsistent with agency mission; or would impose more
burdens, or would
be less useful, than the use of another standard.
b. What must my agency do when such use is determined by my
agency to be
inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical?
The head of your agency must transmit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB),
through the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), an
explanation of the
reason(s) for using government-unique standards in lieu of voluntary
consensus standards.
For more information on reporting, see section 9.
c. How does this policy affect my agency's regulatory authorities and
responsibilities?
This policy does not preempt or restrict agencies' authorities and
responsibilities to
make regulatory decisions authorized by statute. Such regulatory
authorities and
responsibilities include determining the level of acceptable risk;
setting the level of
protection; and balancing risk, cost, and availability of technology in
establishing
regulatory standards. However, to determine whether established
regulatory limits or
targets have been met, agencies should use voluntary consensus standards
for test methods,
sampling procedures, or protocols.
d. How does this policy affect my agency's procurement
authority?
This policy does not preempt or restrict agencies' authorities and
responsibilities to
identify the capabilities that they need to obtain through procurements.
Rather, this
policy limits an agency's authority to pursue an identified capability
through reliance on
a government-unique standard when a voluntary consensus standard exists
(see Section 6a).
e. What are the goals of agency use of voluntary consensus
standards?
Agencies should recognize the positive contribution of standards
development and related
activities. When properly conducted, standards development can increase
productivity and
efficiency in Government and industry, expand opportunities for
international trade,
conserve resources, improve health and safety, and protect the
environment.
f. What considerations should my agency make when it is
considering using a
standard?
When considering using a standard, your agency should take full account
of the effect of
using the standard on the economy, and of applicable federal laws and
policies, including
laws and regulations relating to antitrust, national security, small
business, product
safety, environment, metrication, technology development, and conflicts
of interest. Your
agency should also recognize that use of standards, if improperly
conducted, can suppress
free and fair competition; impede innovation and technical progress;
exclude safer or less
expensive products; or otherwise adversely affect trade, commerce,
health, or safety. If
your agency is proposing to incorporate a standard into a proposed or
final rulemaking,
your agency must comply with the "Principles of Regulation"
(enumerated in
Section 1(b)) and with the other analytical requirements of Executive
Order 12866,
"Regulatory Planning and Review."
g. Does this policy establish a preference between consensus
and non-consensus
standards that are developed in the private sector?
This policy does not establish a preference among standards developed in
the private
sector. Specifically, agencies that promulgate regulations referencing
non-consensus
standards developed in the private sector are not required to report on
these actions, and
agencies that procure products or services based on non-consensus
standards are not
required to report on such procurements. For example, this policy allows
agencies to
select a non-consensus standard developed in the private sector as a
means of establishing
testing methods in a regulation and to choose among
commercial-off-the-shelf products,
regardless of whether the underlying standards are developed by voluntary
consensus
standards bodies or not.
h. Does this policy establish a preference between domestic and
international
voluntary consensus standards?
This policy does not establish a preference between domestic and
international
voluntary consensus standards. However, in the interests of promoting
trade and
implementing the provisions of international treaty agreements, your
agency should
consider international standards in procurement and regulatory
applications.
i. Should my agency give preference to performance standards?
In using voluntary consensus standards, your agency should give
preference to
performance standards when such standards may reasonably be used in lieu
of prescriptive
standards.
Agencies must consult with voluntary consensus standards bodies, both
domestic and
international, and must participate with such bodies in the development
of voluntary
consensus standards when consultation and participation is in the public
interest and is
compatible with their missions, authorities, priorities, and budget
resources.
a. What are the purposes of agency participation?
Agency representatives should participate in voluntary consensus
standards activities in
order to accomplish the following purposes:
(1) Eliminate the necessity for development or maintenance of separate
Government-unique standards.
(2) Further such national goals and objectives as increased use of the
metric system of
measurement; use of environmentally sound and energy efficient materials,
products,
systems, services, or practices; and improvement of public health and
safety.
b. What are the general principles that apply to agency support?
Agency support provided to a voluntary consensus standards activity
must be limited to
that which clearly furthers agency and departmental missions,
authorities, priorities, and
is consistent with budget resources. Agency support must not be
contingent upon the
outcome of the standards activity. Normally, the total amount of federal
support should be
no greater than that of other participants in that activity, except when
it is in the
direct and predominant interest of the Government to develop or revise a
standard, and its
timely development or revision appears unlikely in the absence of such
support.
c. What forms of support may my agency provide?
The form of agency support, may include the following:
(1) Direct financial support; e.g., grants, memberships, and contracts.
(2) Administrative support; e.g., travel costs, hosting of meetings,
and secretarial
functions.
(3) Technical support; e.g., cooperative testing for standards evaluation and
participation of agency personnel in the activities of voluntary
consensus standards
bodies.
(4) Joint planning with voluntary consensus standards bodies to promote
the identification
and development of needed standards.
(5) Participation of agency personnel.
d. Must agency participants be authorized?
Agency employees who, at Government expense, participate in standards
activities of
voluntary consensus standards bodies on behalf of the agency must do so
as specifically
authorized agency representatives. Agency support for, and participation
by agency
personnel in, voluntary consensus standards bodies must be in compliance
with applicable
laws and regulations. For example, agency support is subject to legal and
budgetary
authority and availability of funds. Similarly, participation by agency
employees (whether
or not on behalf of the agency) in the activities of voluntary consensus
standards bodies
is subject to the laws and regulations that apply to participation by
federal employees in
the activities of outside organizations. While we anticipate that
participation in a
committee that is developing a standard would generally not raise
significant issues,
participation as an officer, director, or trustee of an organization
would raise more
significant issues. An agency should involve its agency ethics officer,
as appropriate,
before authorizing support for or participation in a voluntary consensus
standards body.
e. Does agency participation indicate endorsement of any
decisions reached by
voluntary consensus standards bodies?
Agency participation in voluntary consensus standards bodies does not
necessarily connote
agency agreement with, or endorsement of, decisions reached by such
organizations.
f. Do agency representatives participate equally with other
members?
Agency representatives serving as members of voluntary consensus
standards bodies
should participate actively and on an equal basis with other members,
consistent with the
procedures of those bodies, particularly in matters such as establishing
priorities,
developing procedures for preparing, reviewing, and approving standards,
and developing
or adopting new standards. Active participation includes full involvement
in discussions
and technical debates, registering of opinions and, if selected, serving
as chairpersons
or in other official capacities. Agency representatives may vote, in
accordance with the
procedures of the voluntary consensus standards body, at each stage of
the standards
development process unless prohibited from doing so by law or their
agencies.
g. Are there any limitations on participation by agency
representatives?
In order to maintain the independence of voluntary consensus standards
bodies, agency
representatives must refrain from involvement in the internal management
of such
organizations (e.g., selection of salaried officers and employees,
establishment of staff
salaries, and administrative policies). Agency representatives must not
dominate such
bodies, and in any case are bound by voluntary consensus standards
bodies' rules and
procedures, including those regarding domination of proceedings by any
individual.
Regardless, such agency employees must avoid the practice or the
appearance of undue
influence relating to their agency representation and activities in
voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
h. Are there any limits on the number of federal participants
in voluntary
consensus standards bodies?
The number of individual agency participants in a given voluntary
standards activity
should be kept to the minimum required for effective representation of
the various
program, technical, or other concerns of federal agencies.
i. Is there anything else agency representatives should
know?
a. As required by the Act, your agency must report to NIST, no later
than December 31
of each year, the decisions by your agency in the previous fiscal year to use
government-unique standards in lieu of voluntary consensus standards. If
no voluntary
consensus standard exists, your agency does not need to report its use of
government-unique standards. (In addition, an agency is not required to
report on its use
of other standards. See Section 6g.) Your agency must include an
explanation of the
reason(s) why use of such voluntary consensus standard would be
inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical, as described in Sections 11b(2),
12a(3), and
12b(2) of this Circular. Your agency must report in accordance with
format instructions
issued by NIST.
b. Your agency must report to NIST, no later than December 31 of each
year, information on
the nature and extent of agency participation in the development and use
of voluntary
consensus standards from the previous fiscal year. Your agency must
report in accordance
with format instructions issued by NIST. Such reporting must include the
following:
(1) The number of voluntary consensus standards bodies in which there is
agency
participation, as well as the number of agency employees participating.
(2) The number of voluntary consensus standards the agency has
used since the
last report, based on the procedures set forth in sections 11 and 12 of
this Circular.
(3) Identification of voluntary consensus standards that have been
substituted for
government-unique standards as a result of an agency review under section
15b(7) of this
Circular.
(4) An evaluation of the effectiveness of this policy and recommendations
for any changes.
c. No later than the following January 31, NIST must transmit to OMB a
summary report of
the information received.
Your agency should use transaction based reporting if your agency
issues regulations
that use or reference standards. If your agency is issuing or revising a
regulation that
contains a standard, your agency must follow these procedures:
a. Publish a request for comment within the preamble of a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) or Interim Final Rule (IFR). Such request must provide the
appropriate information,
as follows:
(1) When your agency is proposing to use a voluntary consensus
standard, provide a
statement which identifies such standard.
(2) When your agency is proposing to use a government-unique standard
in lieu of a
voluntary consensus standard, provide a statement which identifies such
standards and
provides a preliminary explanation for the proposed use of a
government-unique standard in
lieu of a voluntary consensus standard.
(3) When your agency is proposing to use a government-unique standard,
and no voluntary
consensus standard has been identified, a statement to that effect and an
invitation to
identify any such standard and to explain why such standard should be
used.
b. Publish a discussion in the preamble of a Final Rulemaking that
restates the
statement in the NPRM or IFR, acknowledges and summarizes any comments
received and
responds to them, and explains the agency's final decision. This
discussion must provide
the appropriate information, as follows:
(1) When a voluntary consensus standard is being used, provide a
statement that identifies
such standard and any alternative voluntary consensus standards which
have been
identified.
(2) When a government-unique standard is being used in lieu of a
voluntary consensus
standard, provide a statement that identifies the standards and explains
why using the
voluntary consensus standard would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise
impractical. Such explanation must be transmitted in accordance with the
requirements of
Section 9a.
(3) When a government-unique standard is being used, and no voluntary
consensus standard
has been identified, provide a statement to that effect.
(2) Systematically review your agency's use of government-unique
standards for
conversion to voluntary consensus standards.
(3) Maintain records on the groups or categories in which your agency uses
government-unique standards in lieu of voluntary consensus standards,
including an
explanation of the reasons for such use, which must be transmitted
according to Section
9a.
(4) Enable potential offerors to suggest voluntary consensus standards
that can replace
government-unique standards.
b. How does my agency report the use of standards in
procurements on a
transaction basis?
Your agency should report on a transaction basis when your agency
identifies, manages, and
reviews the use of standards on a transaction basis rather than a
category basis.
Transaction based reporting is especially useful when your agency
conducts procurement
mostly through commercial products and services, but is occasionally
involved in a
procurement involving government-unique standards. To report use of
government-unique
standards on a transaction basis, your agency must follow the following
procedures:
(1) In each solicitation which references government-unique standards,
the solicitation
must:
(i) Identify such standards.
(ii) Provide potential offerors an opportunity to suggest alternative
voluntary consensus
standards that meet the agency's requirements.
(2) If such suggestions are made and the agency decides to use
government-unique standards
in lieu of voluntary consensus standards, the agency must explain in its
report to OMB as
described in Section 9a why using such voluntary consensus standards is
inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
c. For those solicitations that are for commercial-off-the-shelf products
(COTS), or for
products or services that rely on voluntary consensus standards or
non-consensus standards
developed in the private sector, or for products that otherwise do not
rely on
government-unique standards, the requirements in this section do not
apply.
AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
An Agency Standards Executive:
a. Promotes the following goals:
(1) Effective use of agency resources and participation.
(2) The development of agency positions that are in the public
interest and that do not
conflict with each other.
(3) The development of agency positions that are consistent with
administration policy.
(4) The development of agency technical and policy positions that are
clearly defined and
known in advance to all federal participants on a given committee.
b. Coordinates his or her agency's participation in voluntary consensus
standards bodies
by:
(1) Establishing procedures to ensure that agency representatives who
participate in
voluntary consensus standards bodies will, to the extent possible,
ascertain the views of
the agency on matters of paramount interest and will, at a minimum,
express views that are
not inconsistent or in conflict with established agency views.
(2) To the extent possible, ensuring that the agency's participation
in voluntary
consensus standards bodies is consistent with agency missions,
authorities, priorities,
and budget resources.
(3) Ensuring, when two or more agencies participate in a given voluntary
consensus
standards activity, that they coordinate their views on matters of
paramount importance so
as to present, whenever feasible, a single, unified position and, where
not feasible, a
mutual recognition of differences.
(4) Cooperating with the Secretary in carrying out his or her
responsibilities under this
Circular.
(5) Consulting with the Secretary, as necessary, in the development and
issuance of
internal agency procedures and guidance implementing this Circular,
including the
development and implementation of an agency-wide directory identifying
agency employees
participating in voluntary consensus standards bodies and the
identification of voluntary
consensus standards bodies.
(6) Preparing, as described in Section 9, a report on uses of
government-unique standards
in lieu of voluntary consensus standards and a report on the status of
agency standards
policy activities.
(7) Establishing a process for ongoing review of the agency's use of
standards for
purposes of updating such use.
(8) Coordinating with appropriate agency offices (e.g., budget and
legal offices) to
ensure that effective processes exist for the review of proposed agency
support for, and
participation in, voluntary consensus standards bodies, so that agency
support and
participation will comply with applicable laws and regulations.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION